🇬🇧 Y-Hull® — A Novel Ship Hull 📞 +44 7354 517 377  |  ✉ a.wye@shipdyn.com

Technical Brief

Comprehensive technical analysis — design overview, CFD simulation results, and operationally validated performance data for the Y-Hull® hull form.

Study Parameters

Comparative CFD Study: Monohull · Catamaran · Y-Hull®

A similar monohull, catamaran and Y-Hull® vessel were designed and analysed under identical conditions. All three hulls share the same vessel length of 13.5 metres and the same displacement of 17.302 tonnes, tested at their respective design drafts. CFD simulations were conducted using Simcenter STAR-CCM+ across Froude numbers of 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 to evaluate hydrodynamic resistance performance across a range of operating speeds.

Design Overview

Hull Form Description

🔷
Hull Concept

Y-Hull® is a hybrid hull form featuring twin forward demi-hulls that gradually converge into a single stern hull. The vessel operates with single-shaft propulsion, combining the structural economy of a monohull with the stability characteristics of a catamaran.

📐
Principal Particulars

Length: 13.5 m · Displacement: 17.302 tonnes · Single-shaft propulsion · Design tested across Fn = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 corresponding to a range of operational speeds from slow ahead to full speed.

💨
Air Lubrication Effect

The Y-shaped geometry creates a natural air channel underneath the hull from bow to stern. At speed, this air layer reduces the wetted surface area in contact with water, lowering frictional resistance passively — without any active air injection systems.

🌊
Wave-Making Resistance

The twin demi-hull bow configuration reduces the bow wave energy compared to a conventional monohull, lowering wave-making resistance — particularly significant at higher Froude numbers (Fn > 0.3).

Y-Hull 3D Y-Hull Mesh

Y-Hull® 3D Geometry & Computational Mesh

CFD Simulation Results

Resistance Comparison

Percentage efficiency gains of Y-Hull® over Monohull and Catamaran at three Froude numbers (Fn = 0.2, 0.3, 0.4). All vessels at equal displacement of 17.302 tonnes, 13.5m length.

Y-Hull® Efficiency Gain vs Monohull (%)
Fn 0.2
19.45%
Fn 0.3
27.00%
Fn 0.4
25.54%
Higher % = greater Y-Hull® advantage. Peak gain at Fn 0.3 (27.00%)
Y-Hull® Efficiency Gain vs Catamaran (%)
Fn 0.2
1.75%
Fn 0.3
3.53%
Fn 0.4
8.20%
Y-Hull® advantage over catamaran increases significantly with speed. Peak at Fn 0.4 (8.20%)
Y-Hull CFD Results
Monohull Water Surface

Monohull — Water Surface Elevation

Y-Hull Water Surface

Y-Hull® — Water Surface Elevation

Operational Data

Monohull: MV Padma vs Y-Hull®: MV Jamuna

Fuel efficiency comparison from operational vessel data. MV Padma is a conventional monohull; MV Jamuna is a Y-Hull® vessel — both operating on the same route under comparable conditions.

Study Note

Both vessels are of similar size and displacement. Fuel consumption measured under operational conditions at three representative speeds including operational/cruising speed.

Y-Hull® (MV Jamuna) Fuel Efficiency Gain vs Monohull (MV Padma)
2.199 m/s
Slow Ahead
20%
3.200 m/s
Half Speed
30%
3.600 m/s
Cruising Speed
33%⭐
⭐ Operational/cruising speed — 33% fuel efficiency gain over conventional monohull (MV Padma)
20%
At 2.199 m/s
Slow ahead / harbour speed
30%
At 3.200 m/s
Half speed transit
33%
At 3.600 m/s ⭐
Operational cruising speed

Want the Full Technical Report?

Contact us to request the full peer-reviewed technical paper and detailed CFD analysis report.

Request Full Report →